Who’s in Control? The Power of Big Tech in Shaping AI Ethics

Affiliate Disclosure
Some of the links on this blog are affiliate links. This means that if you click on a link and make a purchase, I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products and services I genuinely believe in. Thank you for your support!

AI Is Being Built by a Few Powerful Players

Artificial intelligence is often portrayed as the product of scientific discovery and innovation. But in reality, it’s being shaped—fundamentally—by a handful of powerful tech giants: Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta (Facebook), Apple, OpenAI, and a few others.

These companies control the infrastructure, talent, data, and funding pipelines that drive AI forward.

The result? AI ethics isn’t just a philosophical or academic debate—it’s a power struggle over who gets to write the rules of this transformational technology.

Why Big Tech Wields So Much Influence Over AI

• Data Access: Tech giants have access to vast quantities of user data, critical for training large-scale AI models.

• Compute Power: AI breakthroughs rely on immense computational resources—largely owned by companies with the deepest pockets.

• Talent Acquisition: Big Tech recruits top AI researchers from academia and startups, concentrating knowledge and control.

• Open-Source Gatekeeping: Even “open” models are often released strategically—partially open, partially proprietary—to control access and public perception.

In effect, a small number of private companies now steer the development and deployment of a technology that will shape the future of humanity.

The Ethics Conflict of Interest

These companies often publish their own AI ethics guidelines and principles. But that raises a critical question:
Can the same entities that profit from AI also be trusted to regulate it?

Many critics argue: no.

Consider the conflicts of interest:

• An advertising platform claiming to “ethically” use your emotional data.

• A social media company managing misinformation with AI—while monetizing engagement.

• A cloud provider offering “responsible” AI tools while pushing surveillance products.

Good intentions aren’t enough when the business model depends on growth, speed, and monetizing human behavior.

Self-Regulation Is Not Enough

History shows that self-regulation rarely works in industries with enormous financial incentives and high public risk. From the oil industry to tobacco and finance, unchecked corporate power often leads to harm.

Why would AI be different?

Several high-profile scandals prove the danger:

• Google firing ethical AI researchers like Timnit Gebru and Margaret Mitchell after they raised concerns about bias and power

• Facebook’s role in political radicalization and misinformation, even while claiming to combat it with AI

• Amazon’s use of facial recognition tools by law enforcement, despite civil rights concerns

These cases highlight how internal ethics teams often lose out to profit motives or PR concerns.

The Risk of an AI Oligarchy

If AI continues to evolve under the control of a small elite group of companies, we face serious consequences:

• Ethical monoculture: Narrow value systems embedded into global AI systems

• Limited accountability: Private interests shielded from democratic oversight

• Unequal access: Only large organizations benefit from the most powerful AI tools

• Technological dependency: Entire industries and governments become reliant on corporate APIs and models

This isn’t just about ethics—it’s about economic and political power.

What Can Be Done? Public Oversight and Shared Governance

✅ Steps Toward a More Ethical and Democratic AI Future:

1.              Public Sector Investment
Governments should fund open, public-interest AI research and infrastructure—not just rely on tech companies.

2.              Stronger Regulation
Clear legal frameworks must be enacted to define what’s acceptable in data collection, algorithmic use, and model deployment.

3.              Independent Ethics Boards
AI ethics should not be left to internal corporate teams alone. Independent oversight bodies are essential.

4.              Antitrust and Decentralization
Breaking up monopolies and supporting open-source alternatives can prevent tech consolidation from stifling innovation and fairness.

5.              Global Collaboration
Ethical AI must involve cross-border, multicultural governance—not be dictated by Silicon Valley alone.

Conclusion: Ethics Without Power Is Just Talk

AI has the potential to benefit society—but only if its development and deployment are subject to democratic oversight, not corporate convenience.

We must ask: Who gets to decide what is ethical in AI?
Because right now, that power rests with those who have the most to gain.

To ensure AI serves the public good, ethics must be enforced—not just declared.

Next in the AI Ethics Series:
👉 Post 8: Aligning AI with Human Values – Is Superintelligence Safe?